Lack of concrete, practical discussions around DEI

There is still systemic imbalance and lack of diversity in the workforce that leads to a lack of opportunity for people from marginalised groups. This needs to be fixed systematically. It is especially true in senior roles. There is a large conceptual gap between grassroot advocates and typical corporate diversity training. This is mainly due to corporate diversity training being abstract and not concrete.

A diagram with three rows, Abstract, Cognitive gap, and Concrete. Abstract row is divided into Theoretical (eg. Definitions of DEI, Exploratory DEI Strategy, Demographic benchmarking) and Practical (Not applicable). The Cognitive gap row is one continuous row that is a boundary between the Abstract and the Concrete rows, signifying the cognitive gap that one has to jump in order to translate abstract language into concrete terms that one can understand. The Concrete row is divided into Theoretical (eg. Centering the marginalised, New opportunity creation, Potential individual changes, Intersectionality Spectrum) and Practical (eg. Building safe zones, Providing opportunities, Changing recruitment, Rehumanising people, Power sharing).
A diagram showing the cognitive gap between abstract and concrete, theoretical and practical for DEI. Want to share this? Use DOI: https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10929129

The reason Practical Diversity and Inclusion was created was because there was a need for a tool to help aid communication at a concrete level.

The Cognitive gap row is one continuous row that is a boundary between the Abstract and the Concrete rows, signifying the cognitive gap that one has to jump in order to translate abstract language into concrete terms that one can understand.

By talking at the concrete level, you avoid the Cognitive gap and any miscommunications.

RM